Skip to content

Procurement · Strategic Sourcing

JNPA’s BMCT Sees 64,000 TEU Transhipment Rush — The Loadstar

PSA International-operated Bharat Mumbai Container Terminals (BMCT), the largest box terminal at India’s Nhava Sheva Port (JNPA), faces severe congestion amid a transhipment surge—handling 59,000 TEU in March and 64,000 TEU in April, primarily from Middle East diversions. Customs brokers report deteriorating gate efficiency, breakdown of first-in-first-out discipline, and container dwell times far exceeding acceptable cycles. The Brihanmumbai Customs Brokers Association (BCBA) disclaims liability for delays, detention, demurrage, and rollovers arising from BMCT operations. Though JNPA claims improvements are underway—with normalcy anticipated by early June—truck owner groups threatened suspension of cargo movements, and stakeholder blame-shifting continues to undermine trade reliability.

Original source: theloadstar.com

JNPA’s BMCT Sees 64,000 TEU Transhipment Rush — The Loadstar

PSA International-operated Bharat Mumbai Container Terminals (BMCT), the largest box terminal at India’s Nhava Sheva Port (JNPA), is taking the brunt of trade complaints of cargo handling delays and gate congestion.

BMCT Lagging Behind Other JNPA Terminals

Customs house agents at the port claim while there had been substantial improvement at other JNPA terminals, BMCT paints a picture of lackadaisical efforts to fix the problems.

“BMCT remains the single terminal at JNPA where conditions are not improving at the pace seen elsewhere,” the Brihanmumbai Customs Brokers Association (BCBA) said in a trade notice.

The bottlenecks cited by BCBA range from long truck waits at the gates, disorderly cargo evacuation methods, and truckers’ unwillingness to go to BMCT due to turnaround concerns.

“First-in, first-out discipline has broken down and containers are remaining inside the terminal well beyond acceptable cycle times, with no rational sequence of evacuation,” the group complained.

BCBA also said the consequences of this disruption included cargo missing scheduled vessel connections, lines rolling containers and exporters’ inability to meet contractual obligations, like letters of credit terms.

“BCBA members cannot be held responsible for delays, detention, demurrage, shut-outs, rollovers, or consequential costs arising from cargo movements through BMCT, as these conditions are entirely beyond their control,” the customs brokers added.

Root Cause: Middle East Transhipment Surge

The crux of congestion issues at JNPA was the unexpected buildup of transhipment volumes diverted from the Middle East. The added pressure on port yards was compounded by a shortage of truck drivers usually engaged in handling container moves between JNPA terminals and freight stations off the dock.

BMCT was a first choice for container lines seeking to make ad-hoc calls for the discharge of Middle East boxes as the terminal had substantial spare capacity, after its recent phase 2 launch. As a result, its transhipment handling hit some 59,000 teu in March and 64,000 teu in April, the largest share of JNPA’s Middle East-linked additional volumes, according to data.

Response and Stakeholder Tensions

But, in a 24 May update, the JNPA authority claimed proactive measures had borne significant fruit, with some sort of normalcy expected by early June.

“JNPA, in coordination with the ministry and all stakeholders, remains fully committed to ensuring efficient port operations, minimising logistics disruptions, and safeguarding the interests of exporters, importers, transporters, and the wider trade community,” the authority said.

But truck owner groups serving JNPT last week warned they would be compelled to suspend cargo movements if conditions continued to worsen. The stoppage plan appears to have been shelved for now.

The JNPA congestion issue had also seen a great deal of finger-pointing between stakeholders over the causes of the slowdowns, ultimately hurting trade interests.

Source: The Loadstar

Compiled from international media by the SCI.AI editorial team.

Ask SCI.AI Finished reading? Continue with SCI.AI. Explore the related policy, route, company and historical context. Continue asking
BlueGrace acquires Idaho 3PL Truk TMS to expand Pacific Northwest LTL
AI & Automation

BlueGrace acquires Idaho 3PL Truk TMS to expand Pacific Northwest LTL

BlueGrace Logistics has acquired Idaho-based third-party logistics provider Truk TMS to strengthen its presence in the Pacific Northwest. The deal brings Truk TMS—previously a BlueGrace partner—fully into the company’s ecosystem, granting its customers access to BlueGrace’s Managed Logistics platform and BlueShip technology. Financial terms remain undisclosed. BlueGrace, headquartered in Tampa, Florida, serves over 10,000 customers from nine offices across the U.S. and Mexico and operates a carrier network exceeding 250,000. As a Warburg Pincus portfolio company, BlueGrace previously acquired STB Freight Group and FreightCenter in 2025. Truk TMS CEO Mark Barnes emphasized continuity of service backed by expanded capabilities.

BMW cuts 8,000 jobs by 2027 amid EU supply chain retooling
Procurement

BMW cuts 8,000 jobs by 2027 amid EU supply chain retooling

BMW plans to cut ~8,000 global positions by 2027 — primarily in administration and development — as shrinking margins (down to 2.3% in automotive) and collapsing China deliveries (−30.2% Q2) force structural change. Simultaneously, EU industrial policy pushes for regionalized, policy-aligned auto sourcing. New CEO Milan Nedeljkovic is revisiting 'untouchable' processes across procurement, production, and development — highlighting how lean operations now collide with geopolitical supply chain constraints.

U.S. CEOs Would Pay 17% Premium for Supply Chain Resilience
Procurement

U.S. CEOs Would Pay 17% Premium for Supply Chain Resilience

A Proxima survey of over 500 global CEOs reveals that more than 80% of U.S. executives estimate up to 20% of revenue would be at risk from a two-week disruption among their top three suppliers. The 104 U.S.-based respondents said they would accept an average 17% increase in third-party supplier costs to ensure resilience—70% would accept 11% or more. Geopolitical tensions (30%) topped threat concerns, while 47% reported experiencing a cyber-related supply chain disruption in the past 24 months. Only 39% had conducted a full cyber resilience stress-test in the last year.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Scan to share via WeChat

Open WeChat and scan the QR code to share

QR Code

Add New Playlist