Skip to content

Procurement · Supplier Management

Fuel and LPG Costs Surge in India’s Textile Hubs

Rising fuel and LPG costs have significantly disrupted India’s textile manufacturing hubs, with energy expenses increasing by 42% since Q1 2025. These rises have led to reduced operational hours, extended lead times by 12 days, and a 17% drop in production volume in Coimbatore. Export order cancellations rose by 11% in Q3 2025. The Indian government introduced a 15% LPG subsidy for textile units from November 1, 2025, while aiming for a $350 billion textile sector by 2030. Manufacturers are exploring solar thermal alternatives and energy efficiency upgrades to mitigate ongoing pressure.

Original source: apparelresources.com

Fuel and LPG Costs Surge in India’s Textile Hubs
📋 本文要点

Rising fuel and LPG costs have significantly disrupted India’s textile manufacturing hubs, with energy expenses increasing by 42% since Q1 2025. These rises have led to reduced operational hours, extended lead times by 12 days, and a 17% drop in production volume in Coimbatore. Export order cancellations rose by 11% in Q3 2025. The Indian government introduced a 15% LPG subsidy for textile units from November 1, 2025, while aiming for a $350 billion textile sector by 2030. Manufacturers are exploring solar thermal alternatives and energy efficiency upgrades to mitigate ongoing pressure.

Rising Input Costs Hit Textile Manufacturing Efficiency

According to apparelresources.com, escalating fuel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) prices are significantly impacting production efficiency across India’s key textile manufacturing hubs. A recent report reveals that LPG costs have increased by 42% since Q1 2025, while diesel prices have risen by 38% over the same period. These increases directly affect thermal processing, drying, and weaving operations that rely heavily on gas-based energy sources.

“The cost of energy now accounts for nearly 28% of total production expenses in our facilities, up from 19% in early 2024.” — Rana Das, Mallcom India

Impact on Export Competitiveness and Lead Times

Textile exporters in India’s major clusters—such as Surat, Tiruppur, and Coimbatore—are facing shrinking profit margins. The surge in energy costs has forced some factories to reduce daily operating hours by 15–20% to manage expenses. This reduction has led to an average increase in order lead times by 12 days for export-bound apparel, according to a survey conducted by the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC) in October 2025.

  • Surat-based manufacturers report a 22% rise in operational costs since July 2025
  • Coimbatore factories have seen a 17% decline in monthly production volume due to energy constraints
  • Export order cancellations have risen by 11% in Q3 2025 compared to Q2

Industry Response and Adaptation Strategies

Some manufacturers are adopting short-term mitigation measures, including switching to lower-cost coal alternatives in non-critical processes and renegotiating delivery timelines with international buyers. The Indian government has announced a 15% subsidy on industrial LPG for textile units, effective from November 1, 2025, but industry leaders caution that this will only offset part of the burden.

“We are exploring solar thermal integration for pre-treatment processes, but the upfront investment remains a barrier for SMEs.” — Venkatesh Gopalan, Indorama Corporation

Long-Term Supply Chain Reconfiguration

Analysts predict that sustained high energy prices may accelerate the shift toward nearshoring and regional sourcing models. With India aiming to achieve a $350 billion textiles sector by 2030 and full carbon neutrality, the current energy crisis poses a challenge to these targets. The government’s 2025 budget allocated ₹48 billion (approximately $575 million) to support clean energy adoption in MSMEs, including textile units, through tax incentives and technology grants.

Source: apparelresources.com

Compiled from international media by the SCI.AI editorial team.

Ask SCI.AI Finished reading? Continue with SCI.AI. Explore the related policy, route, company and historical context. Continue asking
BlueGrace acquires Idaho 3PL Truk TMS to expand Pacific Northwest LTL
AI & Automation

BlueGrace acquires Idaho 3PL Truk TMS to expand Pacific Northwest LTL

BlueGrace Logistics has acquired Idaho-based third-party logistics provider Truk TMS to strengthen its presence in the Pacific Northwest. The deal brings Truk TMS—previously a BlueGrace partner—fully into the company’s ecosystem, granting its customers access to BlueGrace’s Managed Logistics platform and BlueShip technology. Financial terms remain undisclosed. BlueGrace, headquartered in Tampa, Florida, serves over 10,000 customers from nine offices across the U.S. and Mexico and operates a carrier network exceeding 250,000. As a Warburg Pincus portfolio company, BlueGrace previously acquired STB Freight Group and FreightCenter in 2025. Truk TMS CEO Mark Barnes emphasized continuity of service backed by expanded capabilities.

BMW cuts 8,000 jobs by 2027 amid EU supply chain retooling
Procurement

BMW cuts 8,000 jobs by 2027 amid EU supply chain retooling

BMW plans to cut ~8,000 global positions by 2027 — primarily in administration and development — as shrinking margins (down to 2.3% in automotive) and collapsing China deliveries (−30.2% Q2) force structural change. Simultaneously, EU industrial policy pushes for regionalized, policy-aligned auto sourcing. New CEO Milan Nedeljkovic is revisiting 'untouchable' processes across procurement, production, and development — highlighting how lean operations now collide with geopolitical supply chain constraints.

U.S. CEOs Would Pay 17% Premium for Supply Chain Resilience
Procurement

U.S. CEOs Would Pay 17% Premium for Supply Chain Resilience

A Proxima survey of over 500 global CEOs reveals that more than 80% of U.S. executives estimate up to 20% of revenue would be at risk from a two-week disruption among their top three suppliers. The 104 U.S.-based respondents said they would accept an average 17% increase in third-party supplier costs to ensure resilience—70% would accept 11% or more. Geopolitical tensions (30%) topped threat concerns, while 47% reported experiencing a cyber-related supply chain disruption in the past 24 months. Only 39% had conducted a full cyber resilience stress-test in the last year.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Scan to share via WeChat

Open WeChat and scan the QR code to share

QR Code

Add New Playlist