Skip to content

Procurement · Strategic Sourcing

USPS flies 50% of long-distance mail to meet UPS air contract

The U.S. Postal Service is flying 50% of long-distance First-Class mail — up from 2% in October 2024 — to meet minimum volume commitments under its $1.5 billion/year air cargo contract with UPS. An Inspector General audit found the $10 billion, 5.5-year agreement misaligned with steep Priority Mail declines (54% pre-contract, 31% post-announcement) and contradicts USPS’s surface-first efficiency strategy. To avoid $127 million in penalties for underutilized air capacity, USPS rerouted Marketing Mail and extended air use despite having projected $1.1 billion in surface savings. The OIG recommends terminating the contract for one with shorter base terms and option years.

Original source: freightwaves.com

USPS flies 50% of long-distance mail to meet UPS air contract
📋 本文要点

The U.S. Postal Service is flying 50% of long-distance First-Class mail — up from 2% in October 2024 — to meet minimum volume commitments under its $1.5 billion/year air cargo contract with UPS. An Inspector General audit found the $10 billion, 5.5-year agreement misaligned with steep Priority Mail declines (54% pre-contract, 31% post-announcement) and contradicts USPS’s surface-first efficiency strategy. To avoid $127 million in penalties for underutilized air capacity, USPS rerouted Marketing Mail and extended air use despite having projected $1.1 billion in surface savings. The OIG recommends terminating the contract for one with shorter base terms and option years.

According to www.freightwaves.com, the U.S. Postal Service is moving approximately half of its long-distance First-Class mail by air — up from just 2% in October 2024 — primarily to fulfill minimum volume commitments under its air cargo contract with UPS.

Air contract drives operational reversal

The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) released an audit on Tuesday that found the USPS misaligned its UPS air cargo agreement with actual parcel volume trends and internal transportation strategy. The contract, awarded in April 2024 and effective in full by October 2024, carries a base term of 5.5 years and an estimated annual value of $1.5 billion. The OIG now places its total projected value at more than $10 billion.

The audit states that USPS failed to account for a steep decline in Priority Mail volume — down 54% before the contract announcement and another 31% afterward — while forecasting instead a modest 2% increase in average daily volume. To avoid penalties for missing minimum cubic-foot volume thresholds, USPS redirected First-Class and Marketing Mail to air transport, even though those categories had historically moved by surface.

Costs surge despite efficiency goals

As part of its six-year Delivering for America transformation plan, USPS had deliberately shifted mail and parcels toward motor carriers to reduce reliance on expensive air transport. In October 2021, it extended First-Class delivery standards by one to two days to enable more surface movement. Then, in 2024, it replaced FedEx as its domestic air cargo provider with UPS. That same year, USPS also adjusted service standards further: adding an extra day to First-Class delivery for post offices located 50 miles or more from regional processing centers while shortening bulk mail delivery times.

The agency projected annual savings of $1.1 billion from surface transportation and $701 million from air transportation due to these optimization initiatives. Yet in fiscal year 2025, USPS exceeded its transportation cost management plan by about $200 million, partly due to returning mail to air transport — a direct consequence of contractual volume obligations.

Contract structure amplifies inefficiency

The UPS contract uses a per-cubic-foot pricing model tied to average daily volume. USPS guarantees a minimum average daily volume, with premium rates triggered if volumes fall below or exceed negotiated thresholds — though specific percentages and volumes are redacted in the public audit report. To maintain favorable pricing tiers and service performance, USPS increased the share of First-Class mail traveling by air within the three-to-five-day delivery window from 2% in October 2024 to 50% by March 2025. It also began flying Marketing Mail — including flyers, brochures, and fundraising letters — for the first time, a category previously handled exclusively by truck.

“The Postal Service did not properly forecast declining package volumes or impacts of subsequent network changes when establishing the volume requirements of its new air cargo contract,” the audit states, “resulting in a decision to put more mail on planes even though this contradicts previous decisions to extend delivery standards to allow more mail to move by surface — simply to meet contractual minimums and avoid even higher expenses.”

OIG recommends contract reassessment

The Inspector General urged USPS logistics officers to consider early termination of the current UPS air contract and pursue a replacement with more adaptable terms. Specifically, the audit recommends a new agreement with a shorter base term and option years to better align with fluctuating volume realities and evolving ground network configurations.

USPS leadership disagreed with the OIG’s assessment, asserting that flying First-Class mail has helped stabilize air network costs by preserving favorable pricing tiers and improving service performance. It also rejected the need for an updated cost-benefit analysis, maintaining that the existing contract provides sufficient flexibility. However, the OIG emphasized that “while the Postal Service’s new air cargo contract delivered several important benefits, including lower rates, greater flexibility, and stronger service performance requirements, the full potential of these advantages was not fully realized as the volume requirements are not aligned with actual volume and operational realities.”

According to the report, failing to supplement package volume with mail would have triggered an additional penalty of $127 million for unused air capacity — illustrating how contractual design, rather than operational logic, now dictates transportation mode selection across the national mail network.

Source: FreightWaves

Compiled from international media by the SCI.AI editorial team.

Ask SCI.AI Finished reading? Continue with SCI.AI. Explore the related policy, route, company and historical context. Continue asking
BlueGrace acquires Idaho 3PL Truk TMS to expand Pacific Northwest LTL
AI & Automation

BlueGrace acquires Idaho 3PL Truk TMS to expand Pacific Northwest LTL

BlueGrace Logistics has acquired Idaho-based third-party logistics provider Truk TMS to strengthen its presence in the Pacific Northwest. The deal brings Truk TMS—previously a BlueGrace partner—fully into the company’s ecosystem, granting its customers access to BlueGrace’s Managed Logistics platform and BlueShip technology. Financial terms remain undisclosed. BlueGrace, headquartered in Tampa, Florida, serves over 10,000 customers from nine offices across the U.S. and Mexico and operates a carrier network exceeding 250,000. As a Warburg Pincus portfolio company, BlueGrace previously acquired STB Freight Group and FreightCenter in 2025. Truk TMS CEO Mark Barnes emphasized continuity of service backed by expanded capabilities.

BMW cuts 8,000 jobs by 2027 amid EU supply chain retooling
Procurement

BMW cuts 8,000 jobs by 2027 amid EU supply chain retooling

BMW plans to cut ~8,000 global positions by 2027 — primarily in administration and development — as shrinking margins (down to 2.3% in automotive) and collapsing China deliveries (−30.2% Q2) force structural change. Simultaneously, EU industrial policy pushes for regionalized, policy-aligned auto sourcing. New CEO Milan Nedeljkovic is revisiting 'untouchable' processes across procurement, production, and development — highlighting how lean operations now collide with geopolitical supply chain constraints.

U.S. CEOs Would Pay 17% Premium for Supply Chain Resilience
Procurement

U.S. CEOs Would Pay 17% Premium for Supply Chain Resilience

A Proxima survey of over 500 global CEOs reveals that more than 80% of U.S. executives estimate up to 20% of revenue would be at risk from a two-week disruption among their top three suppliers. The 104 U.S.-based respondents said they would accept an average 17% increase in third-party supplier costs to ensure resilience—70% would accept 11% or more. Geopolitical tensions (30%) topped threat concerns, while 47% reported experiencing a cyber-related supply chain disruption in the past 24 months. Only 39% had conducted a full cyber resilience stress-test in the last year.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Scan to share via WeChat

Open WeChat and scan the QR code to share

QR Code

Add New Playlist