According to www.maheshwariandco.com, India’s 2026 FDI Policy Amendment permits non-controlling beneficial ownership of up to ten percent (10%) from land-bordering countries (LBCs) under the automatic route, subject to sectoral caps. A sixty-day timeline is mandated for approvals in key manufacturing areas including capital goods, electronic components, and polysilicon. The beneficial ownership test is now applied at the investor entity level, aligned with the Prevention of Money Laundering Rules, 2005. Mandatory reporting to DPIIT preserves transparency, while majority Indian control remains required in strategic sectors.
According to www.maheshwariandco.com, the Union Cabinet has approved amendments to India’s Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy that introduce calibrated relaxations to the restrictive framework established under Press Note 3 (PN3) of 2020. The changes — effective as of April 2026 — redefine how beneficial ownership from land-bordering countries (LBCs) is assessed and regulated, with direct implications for global supply chain professionals managing cross-border investments, joint ventures, and manufacturing partnerships in India.
Core Regulatory Shifts
The amendment introduces a formal definition of “beneficial ownership”, aligning it with criteria under the Prevention of Money Laundering Rules, 2005. Crucially, the beneficial ownership test is now applied at the level of the investor entity, not further upstream in complex fund structures. This resolves long-standing ambiguity that previously forced private equity and venture capital funds — even those with minor exposure to LBC investors — to seek government approvals for otherwise routine transactions.
Under the revised framework, non-controlling beneficial ownership of up to ten percent (10%) from investors based in LBCs — namely China, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan, Nepal, Myanmar, and Afghanistan — is now permitted under the automatic route, provided sectoral caps and entry conditions are met. This represents a targeted recalibration: foreign capital is welcomed to strengthen capacity and technology integration, while strategic oversight remains intact.
Transparency and Timelines
To preserve accountability, the source states that investee entities must disclose relevant information to the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). This mandatory reporting obligation ensures transparency without reintroducing procedural bottlenecks.
Equally consequential for supply chain planning is the introduction of a sixty-day timeline for processing LBC investment proposals in specified manufacturing sectors. As per the report, these include:
- Capital goods
- Electronic capital goods
- Electronic components
- Polysilicon and ingot-wafer production
These sectors are foundational to India’s electronics manufacturing, semiconductor ecosystem, and renewable energy infrastructure — all critical nodes in global supply chains facing pressure to diversify away from single-source dependencies.
Continued Safeguards
The source emphasizes that the requirement for majority shareholding and control to remain with resident Indian citizens or entities owned and controlled by them remains unchanged. This ensures domestic oversight in strategic industries, even as foreign capital enters under more predictable terms.
Context for Supply Chain Professionals
For global supply chain practitioners, this amendment arrives amid intensifying geopolitical scrutiny of cross-border industrial investments — particularly in semiconductors, electronics, and clean energy hardware. India’s move follows similar recalibrations elsewhere: the EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation (2023), the US’s Executive Order 14083 on outbound investment controls (2023), and Japan’s tightened screening of LBC-linked investments in critical tech (2024). Unlike blanket restrictions, India’s approach introduces granularity — distinguishing between controlling and non-controlling stakes, applying clear thresholds (10%), and anchoring timelines to priority manufacturing subsectors. Practically, this means faster setup of component sourcing hubs, quicker approval for foreign-owned contract manufacturers serving global OEMs, and reduced legal friction in multi-tier investment vehicles common in global electronics supply chains.
Source: www.maheshwariandco.com
Compiled from international media by the SCI.AI editorial team.
